Building measure-based prediction models for UML class diagram maintainability (bibtex)
by Genero, Marcela, Manso, Esperanza, Visaggio, Aaron, Canfora, Gerardo and Piattini, Mario
Abstract:
The usefulness of measures for the analysis and design of object oriented (OO) software is increasingly being recognized in the field of software engineering research. In particular, recognition of the need for early indicators of external quality attributes is increasing. We investigate through experimentation whether a collection of UML class diagram measures could be good predictors of two main subcharacteristics of the maintainability of class diagrams: understandability and modifiability. Results obtained from a controlled experiment and a replica support the idea that useful prediction models for class diagrams understandability and modifiability can be built on the basis of early measures, in particular, measures that capture structural complexity through associations and generalizations. Moreover, these measures seem to be correlated with the subjective perception of the subjects about the complexity of the diagrams. This fact shows, to some extent, that the objective measures capture the same aspects as the subjective ones. However, despite our encouraging findings, further empirical studies, especially using data taken from real projects performed in industrial settings, are needed. Such further study will yield a comprehensive body of knowledge and experience about building prediction models for understandability and modifiability.
Reference:
Building measure-based prediction models for UML class diagram maintainability (Genero, Marcela, Manso, Esperanza, Visaggio, Aaron, Canfora, Gerardo and Piattini, Mario), In Empirical Software Engineering, Springer US, volume 12, 2007.
Bibtex Entry:
@article{Genero2007,
abstract = {The usefulness of measures for the analysis and design of object oriented (OO) software is increasingly being recognized in the field of software engineering research. In particular, recognition of the need for early indicators of external quality attributes is increasing. We investigate through experimentation whether a collection of UML class diagram measures could be good predictors of two main subcharacteristics of the maintainability of class diagrams: understandability and modifiability. Results obtained from a controlled experiment and a replica support the idea that useful prediction models for class diagrams understandability and modifiability can be built on the basis of early measures, in particular, measures that capture structural complexity through associations and generalizations. Moreover, these measures seem to be correlated with the subjective perception of the subjects about the complexity of the diagrams. This fact shows, to some extent, that the objective measures capture the same aspects as the subjective ones. However, despite our encouraging findings, further empirical studies, especially using data taken from real projects performed in industrial settings, are needed. Such further study will yield a comprehensive body of knowledge and experience about building prediction models for understandability and modifiability.},
author = {Genero, Marcela and Manso, Esperanza and Visaggio, Aaron and Canfora, Gerardo and Piattini, Mario},
doi = {10.1007/s10664-007-9038-4},
isbn = {1066400790384},
issn = {13823256},
journal = {Empirical Software Engineering},
keywords = {Class diagrams,Controlled experiments,Empirical validation,Maintainability,Measures,Modifiability,Prediction model,Size,Structural complexity,UML,Understandability,cocome_lit-review},
mendeley-tags = {cocome_lit-review},
number = {5},
pages = {517--549},
publisher = {Springer US},
title = {{Building measure-based prediction models for UML class diagram maintainability}},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10664-007-9038-4},
volume = {12},
year = {2007}
}
Powered by bibtexbrowser